Topic: NEWSPAPER ARTICLE ON DACA

Description

summarize and analyze a newspaper article on a political issue.
The writing assignment should be between 1-2 pages. The first half of the paper should be a summary of the newspaper article’s main points. The second half of the paper should be your analysis of the newspaper article. Your analysis can take many different forms: Do you agree or
disagree with the article’s main points, and why? How will this political issue affect the United States? Will a new law make a positive or negative change to American politics?

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Essay

Subject: Education

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Gun Control should not be lowered.

Gun Control should not be lowered.
Introduction
American gun control laws date back as far as the colonial era, revolutionary times and the frontier expansion. The United States have 120.5 guns per 100 people making it the gun capital of the world. The second amendment clearly states that people are free to bare firearms for security use and nothing should infringe this right.

It may be in interests of young children for gun control to be reduced. Children under the age of 19 are killed by gun related accidents across the united states and this one of the reasons to be considered while reducing gun control. Many people reason that more guns will reduce violence but that is not the case because the more guns are circulated it makes it easier for thugs to get hands on them and use them for violence. Owning a gun increases your own chances of protecting yourself from buglers.

Gun control should not be lowered because it makes you prepared for attacks from thugs making it possible for people to protect and defend themselves. If a licensed gunowner choses to commit crime using their guns, they should be given a long sentence because he puts citizens at risk.

The gun debate has divided many Americans but bottom line is that guns have reduced crime and if it is reduced, it means that many people will be rendered helpless making them targets which can be avoided if the debate to reduce gun control can be stopped.

Guns are known to do both good and evil and gun owners should be judged according to their own faults. Just because a gun owner decides to use his gun for violence it should not infringe anyone’s right to own a gun for protection. Finding and taking guns from criminals is a difficult initiative but it should be embraced in all states through more security searches.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Essay

Subject: English

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: High School

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: Food Insecurity essay

Description

relate minimum wage on how it comes into play with food insecurity. Explain how minimum wage is a problem is the U.S . put the websites you use on a different paper use as many pieces of information you need at least 6 sources

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Essay

Subject: English

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: High School

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

One cannot live well, sleep well, love well if he has not dined well Virginia wolf analysis

The task of these assignments is to locate an argument, give an orderly reconstruction of that argument, and evaluate it.
1. Identify an argument
As you are reading, you should stop every so often and ask yourself “What are they saying here?” They might be giving a
definition or characterizing a concept (just in order to set up a part of the discussion), they may be discussing the work of
other authors or ways of thinking about the topic (again, mainly to set things up and to provide context), or they might be
stating a definite claim about something regarding the topic. Most authors will develop positions of their own in the
readings we are giving, and they have to support those positions. They develop those positions by making claims and
supporting claims. The claims are the conclusions of arguments, and the support is made up of premises. I will be locating
specifically important parts of some of the pieces assigned and asking you to identify what the author is stating in that
passage and how they are supporting that claim.
2. Put the argument in Strict Form
This is the hardest part. When you’ve located the positive claim and located its support, now you need to figure out how
all the moving pieces work. Start with the conclusion and work through, step by step, how they justify that conclusion.
This will most likely take multiple attempts at each premise, multiple re-orderings, and reconstructing most of the
language. You will most likely not find the full argument laid out explicitly in the assigned passage. You will have to insert
implied premises, reconstruct difficult or complex sentences, and perhaps give a conclusion that the author doesn’t
One cannot think
well, love well,
sleep well, if one
has not dined well.
explicitly state. But is that what the author is saying? If so, then include it in the Strict Form. Number the premises as well
as the conclusion. More details on Strict Form are below.
3. Organize and evaluate
What do you think about what just happened there in the reading? Your critique should have three parts: i) an introductory
few sentencesthat briefly present the main ideas of the argument in your own words (10-15%); ii) a larger body paragraph
(or paragraphs) that critically examine(s) the truth of one or more of the premises, the validity of the argument as a whole,
the problematic entailments of the argument for the larger paper or topic, or potential criticisms and the author’s
response to those criticisms (75-85%); and iii) a brief concluding paragraph summarizing your results (5-10%). Most of the
assignment, therefore, should be evaluation and analysis. Please don’t present or explain the argument in this section.
The Strict Form is there to present the ideas in the most clear and explicit terms. You have a brief introduction to present
the overall thrust of the piece. The rest should be some deep analysis of the argument presented.
Some of the questions you should be asking and answering are as follows: Is it a good argument? Are all of the premises
true? If the author presents or evaluates the argument you are yourself evaluating, did they present and evaluate it
correctly? Did they miss anything? Are there any entailments of the authors arguments that are problematic? The goal in
this section is to provide your intellectual response: Is it correct? Is it justified? Is it (intellectually) interesting? Why or
why not? That last one is the most important. If you agree with the author and find their reasoning to be cogent, then
what are some potential criticisms that the author might face? How should the author respond to those criticisms?
I am looking for quite substantial discussions of the arguments in question, focused mainly on evaluation and analysis of
those arguments. You don’t need to present the argument – your analysis will give me an idea of how much you
understand how the argument works and what it is really saying. Think of these as mini-papers. They are only to be one
page in length, but they should be a dense one page.

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: The Power of Music in Recovering from Addiction

Mini-Thesis
Topic: The Power of Music in Recovering from Addiction
This will be anything EXCEPT a biography. You will come up with a topic for research that can be; hypothesis, comparison, prediction, cause and effect, etc. as long as it involves music. Three (3) different reference sources (other than the internet), 6 citations. Graded on adherence to guidelines, accuracy and quality of research. If you have writing issues get with a tutor and have all your work proof read. Read some of the examples from past students to get an idea of what I expect.

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: Feminist Rhetorical Theories

Description

A full MLA citation for the source
A brief summary of the source. Focus on covering the main arguments and sections of the article. Most effective summaries are approximately 150 words long. Do not plagiarize the source in your summary. Do not copy other summaries online or the article abstract. Write the summary in your own words, but stay true to the original article.
A brief assessment of how you can use this source. Focus on connecting the source to your own project. Explain how specific elements of the source can be useful or where you will use them in the project. Most effective assessments are approximately 50 words long.
Must be from Scholarly Articles.

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

compare two news articles on the false missile alarm mishap that occurred in Hawaii.

Comparison Contrast Essay Outline (Point by Point Method)
I. Introduction (Include some background information like the suggested points below)
• This essay will compare two news articles on the false missile alarm mishap that occurred in Hawaii.
• The first article, “Hawaii Says Fix in Place After Alarming Error,” by Amy B. Wang ran on January 15, 2018. The second article, dated January 14, 2018, is titled “Missile Alert Sparks Terror; For Nearly 40 Minutes, Vulnerable Hawaii Thought the End Was Near” by Sonali Kohli, Michael A.W. Ottey, and Heidi Chang.
• In Wang’s article, the writer reports the events leading up to and surrounding the false alarm based on a factual account of what occurred. In the article written by Kohli, Ottey and Chang, the writers give the reader an idea of what residents experienced during the false missile alarm from their personal perspective of what occurred.
• Although the two articles share some similarities, the differences between “Hawaii Says Fix in Place” and “Missile Alert Sparks Terror” are clear.

• II. Body Paragraph 1 – In comparison, “Hawaii Says Fix in Place” and “Missile Alert Sparks Terror”, both detail the events leading up to the error and ways to stop it from happening again.
• Article 1 – How the error occurred?
o Hawaii Says Fix in Place,” Wang provides the reader with a brief overview of the job responsibility of the HEMA (Hawaii Emergency Management Agency) employee.
o Wang states, “Among his duties that day was to initiate an internal test of the emergency missile warning system: essentially, to practice sending an emergency alert to the public without actually sending it to the public.”
o The author later elaborates that the employee made the mistake of selecting the wrong choice on the computer which led to an actual missile alert.
o In “Missile Alert Sparks Terror,” the authors stated, “According to the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, the false alarm happened when an employee, whom it would not identify, hit the wrong button during routine test.”

• Article 2 – Solutions for preventing the error from reoccurring
o In “Hawaii Says Fix in Place,” the writer states that a “two-person” activation/verification rule for test and actual missile launch notifications.
o “Missile Alert Sparks Terror,” stated, “Two employees will be required to send out alerts: one to alert and another to verify and send it.”
III. Body Paragraph 2 – In contrast, the articles supplied different perspectives of the incident, as well as distinctive styles of writing.
• Article 1 – Perspective of Incident
o In Wang’s article, she focuses on the error and the role that HEMA played.
o “Missile Alert Sparks Terror,” the authors focus on the residents’ response.
• Article 2 – Details of technical jargon
o Wang elaborates on FEMA’s warning systems and includes that their effort is a collaborative one with the FCC and wireless industry.
o Although mentioned, Kohli, Ottey and Chang do not discuss FEMA’s role in detail but stated that approval was needed to send out a false alarm notification.
IV. Conclusion (Include the points below)
• In conclusion, the articles “Hawaii Says Fix in Place After Alarming Error” and “Missile Alert Sparks Terror” both discuss the mishap that happened in Hawaii; however, Wang focuses solely on the error itself, whereas Kohli, Ottey, and Chang give the audience a firsthand account of what it was like for some people to live in that moment. In both articles it was clear that HEMA is working on a solution to prevent this from happening again.

Works Cited
Sonali Kohli, Michael A.W. Ottey and Heidi Chang. “Missle Alert Sparks Terror; For Nearly 40 Minutes, Vulnerable Hawaii Thought the End Was Near.” Los Angeles Times 14 January 2018.
Wang, Amy B. “Hawaii Says Fix in Place After Alarming Error.” Chicago Tribune 15 January 2018: 9.

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: The best way to store electronic data

Description

Write a proposal for the small business owner regarding his or her options for storage.

Discuss the options for virtual and physical storage.
Describe the ease or difficulty of deployment and configuration. Which is easiest to set up and use?
Identify the differences in the cost of each option.
Identify potential security concerns for each option.
Based on what you learned, provide a recommendation for this small business about whether it should use physical or virtual storage. Support your recommendation with solid reasons from your reading.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. Use spell check in Word to confirm spelling and grammar.
Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
Length of paper: 2 pages, double-spaced.

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Why would you read the Cathedral in 20 years to come.

Topic proposal I want to write about the Cathedral it is a short story written by Raymond Carver.

Put guidelines in the first paragraph of the story.

a). thesis with “In 20 years from now I will read the Cathedral because….”

b). 4 supporting reasons

c). cite from the Story.