Topic: Social Realism in South Korean cinema

Topic: Social Realism in South Korean cinema
Description

In this dissertation, look at the social realism film genre in South Korean Cinema. I have to examine social realism genre, the history of South Korean cinema, the transformation of film policy, and the social background.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: Dissertation

Pages / words: 37/ 10000

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: What are the strategies used by Teachers and Teaching assistants, with children who have dyslexia in UK primary schools.

Description

Questions

What are the strategies used by Teachers and Teaching assistants, with children who have dyslexia in UK primary schools.

1) How is dyslexia diagnosed
A) Medical Model/Labels
B) Social/Educational model

2) Identification of dyslexia
3) Interventions/support
4) What support do teachers give primary school children
5) What help do teaching assistants give in the classroom
6) What training is required for teachers and teaching assistants

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: english

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: Social Media in the Workplace

Abstract – 3.4 – The abstract is informative and engaging and reflects the key parts of the paper. The main aspects are clearly articulated with a brief outline of the research gap too. However, the abstract could have benefitted from a better structure (it would have been nice to describe both the negative and positive effects of social media as results of your study as now it seems like you have focused only on the adverse ones), elaboration of the applied research methods and discussion of the application of your findings. Appropriate keywords have been identified.
Introduction – 5.5 – The introduction is written in line with the journal requirements (although these have not been included in the journal rationale sheet) and contains relevant information. However, there is no definition of social media, limited references and lack of discussion of the original contribution of the findings. In addition, the research question is phrased in a biased way, revealing focus on the adverse effects of social media only, whereas the interview schedule shows focus on both types of effects. The presentation also needs amendment as it is characterized by an incorrect paragraph structure and use of improper metaphors (e.g. a window to learn more about employees, etc.). Credit should be given for your attempt to outline the importance of the topic, the existing research gap and clearly state the research goal based on this.
Literature review – 5.6 – This section is interesting and engaging but fails to show wide reading and in-depth understanding of the topic. You have made an attempt to clarify the concepts in your research but have not discussed any conceptual issues, e.g. controversial or vague definitions. In addition, you have provided some but insufficient research support for your statements. The research gap has been clearly stated but then you provide a lot of information that seems to answer the research question and imply the use of a quantitative approach rather than the applied qualitative method, which can be further assumed from the description of the research problem and question. The presentation seems scattered and needs logical links between the subsections and consistency in your focus – you switch between organisational and individual viewpoints with no transitions and it is hard for your reader to follow the line of thought. Moreover, there is irrelevant information in terms of the goal of your study (i.e. you discuss the benefits of external social media use for organisations but your research question is related to the internal use of social media, at least this is what can be assumed from your interview schedule). There are also overloaded paragraphs, containing too many ideas at once; an unfinished subsection, which is very confusing, and inappropriately used contractions (e.g. it’s). Finally, there is no need for you to have separate subsections on the theoretical framework, research problem and question and Maslow’s theory seems to explain the reasons for social media use but not the way it affects employees’ work performance, which you claim. However, you should be credited for the exhibited criticality.
Methodology – 6 – Although it comprises some adequate explanations and covers all the required key elements, this section includes repetitive content as well as irrelevant or inconsistent information. There is also a lot of discrepancies, which refer to the tenses used throughout the section, the sample size descriptions and the measures subsection (it contains confusing information and fails to explain how it is related to the chosen qualitative design of the study). In addition, no analytical methods have been mentioned and the process of data analysis remains unclear. Finally, for anonymity reasons there is no need to mention the exact departments, where your participants work.
Results – 6 – The section reveals lack of understanding of the way to conduct qualitative research and report its findings. Credit can only be given for the attempt to analyse the data in a quantitative way, which however apart from being incorrect, given the research design and sample size, is also superficial as it conveys only descriptive information with no in-depth analysis.
Discussion – 17.5 – This section is limited, which is due not only to the incorrectly performed analysis (therefore, incorrect results) but also to the lack of sufficient explanation of your findings (you have provided a few supporting references but have made no attempt to explain any similarities or differences between your discoveries and previous evidence). Credit can be given for analysing the limitations of your study, which could have been done with a higher degree of abstraction, and the suggestions for future research, which are also quite limited. You could have also finished the paper with an outline of the implications of your study.
References – 3 – The referencing section is complete and contains up-to-date sources but there are inaccuracies in terms of the APA referencing requirements.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: Dissertation

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Midwifery in UK and areas that require improvement

Module Learning Outcomes

1. Identify and demonstrate critical understanding of the need to continually evaluate and improve practice.

2. Demonstrate the ability to conduct a comprehensive search for research and evidence to inform practice and the development of the midwifery profession

3. Discuss the contribution knowledge, research and evidence makes to service improvement and to the development of the midwifery profession.

4. Analyse how practice and women centred care can be developed through a range of tools such as service improvement, service evaluation methodologies and audit

5. Synthesise and appraise an extensive range of evidence to inform service improvement and/or the development of the midwifery profession.

6. Critically analyse ethical issues in the practice of research and service improvement/evaluation.

7. Make recommendations for practice improvement, identifying barriers and challenges of implementation

8. Critically reflect on own learning and the contribution of learning to professional development

2. Assignment Brief
Assessment Guidelines Outline
For your dissertation, you will be expected to identify an area of enquiry relating to Midwifery practice, undertake a critical literature review relating to your chosen topic, identify aspects of practice which require improvement, and develop a service improvement plan relating to one of these issues. The dissertation must demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes above.
See below for more detailed guidance

Dissertation Guidance
What is a literature review?
A literature review is a comprehensive study and interpretation of the literature on a specific topic. Literature reviews make an important contribution to evidence based care. They do this by critically appraising evidence in a systematic way to identify what is known an aspect about of practice; they are also useful in revealing gaps in our knowledge and aspects of health care that need improvement.
What use are literature reviews?
As well as informing practice decisions, literature reviews are also used as a basis for health care policy and guidelines, for the development of service user/carer resources, as articles for publication and in applications for funding for research grants. On an individual level, undertaking a literature review will help you develop a range of useful skills, both practical and academic. These include; sourcing and handling large volumes of information, critically appraising evidence, expressing ideas clearly in writing and planning how to improve practice. Given the ever increasing volume of publications and research available, the ability to select and analyse high quality evidence in a time-efficient way will be a useful skill throughout your career and in many aspects of your practice as a health care professional.

What will I need to know?
This dissertation will draw on the knowledge and understanding of research and the intellectual skills you have built up during your programme, particularly through your studies of Evidence Based Practice. Timetabled sessions have been arranged during the dissertation module for you to refresh your skills, for example, in academic writing and critiquing skills.

What does the dissertation involve?
The dissertation offers a chance to explore in depth a specific aspect of practice that is of interest to you and that you believe requires improvement. The first step is to choose a subject to focus on of a contemporary midwifery practice issue. It is helpful if this is something you are interested in and will sustain your interest over a number of months. You will identify a specific question, then search, review and critique the literature on this topic. This will enable you to identify implications for practice and suggest recommendations. The final component is to develop a service improvement plan, outlining how one aspect of the topic you have reviewed could be put into practice.
What is service improvement?
Service improvement has been described as; “the combined and unceasing efforts of everyone… to make the changes that will lead to better patient outcomes (health), better system performance (care) and better professional development (learning)”, (Batalden & Davidoff 2007). For the midwifery dissertation, the need for service improvement can be identified from the perspective of women and their families, the midwife or from wider policy and health drivers.

What support will I receive?
You will be allocated a supervisor from the Midwifery team who guide and support you whilst you are undertake your dissertation. This support will be arranged on an individual basis between you and the supervisor, based on an individual learning contract and action plan. It is good practice to contact your supervisor early in the module run in order to make the most of the time available. In addition to this individual support there are timetabled sessions with the Module Leader and other faculty staff.

Suggested Structure for the Dissertation
Word count 6,000 words
The 6000 word count begins at the start of Chapter 1 and ends at the end of chapter 4. There is no +/-10% leeway. The word count does not include: The title page, dedications or acknowledgements, list of contents, abstract, reference list, or appendices.

Title Page
Acknowledgements
Contents
ABSTRACT (200 words, not included in the word count)
● Include sections: Purpose, Method, Findings and Conclusions.
● References are not normally required here. Do not use abbreviations in the abstract.
● Identify up to 5 key words
● Include a summary box, at the end of the Abstract, summarising what is already known about the topic and what the review adds

Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION (approximately 500 words)
The purpose of this chapter is to outline the context in which your study was undertaken, it
● Sets the scene and gives reasons for the review and its relevance to practice.
● Outlines the controversies, debates and challenges in relation to the specific area of enquiry.
● Includes specific questions or areas to be addressed in the review
● Identifies at least one aspect from the literature review on which a service improvement plan will be developed
Remember, the choice of topic must have a midwifery practice focus.

Chapter 2: METHODS (approximately 500 words)
The purpose of this chapter is to outline and justify the methods used to source the evidence. The process must be rigorous and transparent
The chapter should present your search strategy, which should include the following:
● Key words and MeSH terms (Medical Subject Headings) or Subject Headings or Thesaurus Terms used.
● The databases used, with a rationale for their choice
● The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to refine your search.
● The results of your search. How you came to selecting the final choice of research papers must be clearly identified. This may be presented as a flow diagram and must be included in the appendices,
● Documents and other sources used, with a rationale, e.g. indexes, bibliographies.
● The critiquing framework you selected or developed, and the rationale for this.
● An acknowledgement of the limitations of the material you have accessed.
● The identification of the main themes to arise from the literature search. These themes will then be explored in Chapter three.

Note on using non-UK literature:
It may be necessary to include non-UK literature to ensure the most relevant evidence is captured. However, you must consider issues of transferability and generalisability of international evidence to the UK setting and your particular area of practice and give a justification for its inclusion.

Note on date of publication:
You should draw on evidence which has been published within the last 10 years. Older items may be included if these are seminal works or there is a lack of more recent evidence but justification must be provided.

Chapter 3: CRITICAL REVIEW of the literature (approximately 3000 words)
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a critical review of the available evidence on your selected topic. This will include an, in-depth review of primary research and reference to other sources of evidence if relevant which will help you answer your question or specific area of enquiry. You may wish to organise this chapter into sub-sections which reflect the main themes/findings to emerge from your review. In summary, this chapter should;
● Focus on the questions or specific area of enquiry identified in the introduction.
● Identify, compare and contrast the findings from the research evidence evidence. (You must choose between 4-6 primary research studies)
● Critically review the research and other sources of evidence if relevant.
● Show evidence of your ability to synthesise and evaluate information by making connections between what you have found from reviewing and critiquing the literature and applying this to midwifery practice.
● Draw out recommendations and identify areas for service improvement and select one of these to develop in chapter four.

Note on number of key papers:
To achieve the learning outcome ‘to critically analyse a range of evidence’ it is anticipated that you will need to critique between four and six key pieces of primary research evidence. Other types of evidence such as service evaluation, audits, guidelines and secondary research could be included but you do not need to critique these in detail. Please discuss this with your supervisor. You may find it helpful to prepare a summary table of the key evidence. You can refer to this as you are preparing the chapter and then include it in the appendices.

Chapter 4: PLAN TO IMPLEMENT SERVICE IMPROVEMENT (approximately 2000 words)
The purpose of this chapter is to focus on one aspect from the literature review where service improvement is required and develop a service improvement plan.

● Select one of your key findings from Chapter 3 where service improvement is required and provide a rationale for your choice. The rationale should link to the aim or specific question of your review that was identified in the Introduction.

● Present a service improvement plan outlining specific ways in which the change you are proposing could be implemented. Consider aspects of change management and barriers to practice/change.

● Suggest ways in which the service improvement could be evaluated

● Provide an overall conclusion to your dissertation. You may conclude with a brief reflection on your key personal learning.

Reference List
Formatted in UWE Harvard style, listed alphabetically.
Bibliography
This is optional: if including, it must be formatted in UWE Harvard style.
Appendices
Please include the following:
● A flow diagram of your search strategy
● A summary table of the key papers reviewed in chapter three.
NB. Further detailed guidance is available on Blackboard in the learning materials section and also in the ‘Frequently asked Questions’ (FAQs) section.

The word limit is 6,000 words.
If you exceed the word count the marker will stop reading once the word limit has been reached and nothing further will be taken into account in the allocation of marks. The word count needs to be clearly and correctly stated on the title page of the assignment. Incorrectly understating the word count constitutes an assessment offence and may result in further action.

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: Gender representation in video games

Assessment Task
A 5,000 word dissertation that demonstrates
understanding and analysis of contemporary developments, issues and practices within the
field of computer games and the wider context. You can refer to other practices, like film
or animation, if relevant.
Students are asked to demonstrate that they can undertake independent and critically
engaged research, producing a piece of academic writing that is informed by scholarly
activity. Students are required to engage with secondary sources that are respected in
their field of study.
The dissertation should build upon the Literature Review produced during the Level 5
Critical Discourse 1 studies. Expand your discussion and analysis of the texts used and add
further texts to develop your arguments. Do not submit the exact same wording as used
within the Literature Review, as this will be deemed as academic misconduct.
1
Academic Services
June 2017
The work should evidence progress in all areas over and above Level 5, and include
elements such as: references; quotes; supporting images; bibliography; introduction;
abstract; a contents page; and an Appendix (if appropriate).
The unit is assessed in terms of your ability to academically write on the topic under
investigation in a way that is clearly informed by the research undertaken and contains the
following elements: ambition, understanding, critical evaluation, a persuasive argument
and clarity of communication.
Presentation Guidelines – please read carefully as failure to adhere to them will impact
on your grade.
Your essay must be 5,000 words (+ or – 10%). Quotes count as part of the word count, but
the Contents page and the Bibliography are not included in the word count. It must be
double-spaced throughout in Arial font size 12 and all pages numbered.
Citation and bibliography must follow the Harvard system. Students should refer to the
unit’s SOL page for further details on the Harvard Referencing System.
Your essay must have a front cover sheet with your full given name, student number,
assignment name and number (i.e. Dissertation, AE1) and the unit title and code (i.e.
Critical Discourse 2, VCA300) and your tutor’s full name (i.e. Nick Hampton).

Topic: An investigation into cloud computing

This is a literature review for a dissertation. The title of the literature review will be ‘An investigation into cloud computing’. provided is a proposal and technical plan to help you complete this. I have also provided a template for you to follow. Any problems please contact me. This literature review needs to be graded for a first. Use 10 -15 references from journal papers no older than 2016. Please reference them correctly using Harvard referencing.

Computing Degree Project Proposal
Data storage has become one of the most challenging issues in modern, technology-ridden society. Such challenges ascribe to the massive amounts of data obtained and handled in the real business and social life (Cunha et al., 2017). A massive flow of information has created a scenario where there is a demand for computing resources. With large demands, computation problems have been identified, and information technology experts have put efforts to develop platforms to address these problems (Sun et al., 2014). One of the platforms developed is cloud computing, which, in the past few years, has proven to be an effective platform to develop computational solutions (Cunha et al., 2017). Cloud computing has been developed with the vision of no limitations in resources, that entails a transparent scale approach. It helps organisations put efforts on business by providing a scalability scenario and reduce the cost of sharing and storing data (Cunha et al., 2017).
While data storage is a key part of cloud computing (Liu and Dong, 2012), cloud computing has its challenges, including changes in organisational culture in terms of different aspects of the operation like security and legal issues (Spoorthy, Mamatha, and Kumar, 2014; Godhankar & Gupta, 2014). It is, therefore, important to establish the best cloud computing platforms. In this paper, the author proposes the creation of a range of cloud servers on Raspberry Pi and analyse them individually to find out best among them. This will improve testing the design, efficacy to works, transfer speeds, and ease of use. In doing so, the project will be establishing the characteristics of the best cloud server for data storage. It will also show the difference between effective and ineffective computer-based cloud servers. In developing several cloud servers and outlining their strengths and weaknesses, the researcher hopes to eliminate the challenges associated with cloud servers in relation to data storage.
Specific Objectives
1. To set up Raspberry Pi for the creation of multiple cloud servers for data storage
2. To create cloud servers for data storage in Raspberry Pi.
3. To test the design, efficiency, data transfer speed and ease of use of cloud servers created in Raspberry Pi.
Potential Ethical or Legal Issues
The ethical issues associated with the project include; security and privacy in relation to using real data to test the design, transfer speeds, ease of use, and efficacy of the cloud servers (Faragardi, 2017). Another ethical issue relates to compliance with the rules set to govern cloud servers. This means that the research will have to develop cloud servers that comply with the set standards (Faragardi, 2017).
Resources
The resources necessary to complete this project include; Raspberry Pi, hard drives for data storage, funds to support project requirement, human capital, and time. Also software for the Pi, including Raspbian, OwnCloud, SeaFile, NextCloud etc.
Potential Commercial Considerations – Estimated costs and benefits
Commercially, the project will consider the price of Raspberry Pi, which is almost £60. There are peripheral costs as well as resource costs necessary to complete the project. The researcher estimates a cost of £300. Also, the costs for the developer’s time to create the servers will be the wage timed by the estimated amount of time it will take to create (10 x 200) which is £2000. However, there will be benefits, especially considering the developed cloud servers will be for sale. From the best cloud server created, the researcher anticipates making over £1000.
Proposed Approach
In setting up the Raspberry Pi, SSH will be used to connect the Raspberry Pi on another computer for purposes of not plugging in peripherals all the time. This will make it easier to use Raspberry Pi during the project. I will use Dynamic DNS and port forwarding so that the LAN can be accessed from outside of the network, therefore allowing me to SSH to the Raspberry Pi from anywhere in the world. Three servers would then be created on the PI and be tested against a set of requirements to determine which one works best.
References
Cunha, C.R., Morais, E.P., Sousa, J.P. and Gomes, J.P., 2017. The role of cloud computing in the development of information systems for SMEs. Journal of Cloud Computing, 2017, pp.1-7.
Faragardi, H.R., 2017. Ethical considerations in cloud computing systems. In Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings, 1(3), p. 166.
Godhankar, P.B. and Gupta, D., 2014. Review of Cloud Storage Security and Cloud Computing Challenges. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 5(1), pp.528-533.
Liu, K. and Dong, L.J., 2012. Research on cloud data storage technology and its architecture implementation. Procedia Engineering, 29, pp.133-137.
Spoorthy, V., Mamatha, M. and Kumar, B.S., 2014. A survey on data storage and security in cloud computing. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3(6), pp.306-313.
Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Xiong, Y. and Zhu, G., 2014. Data security and privacy in cloud computing. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(7), pp.1-9.

Dissertation on gangs literature review chapter

Two components of the Level 6
40 credit level 6 module
10,000 word dissertation
Extended literature review

20 credit level 6 module
4000 word Research Awareness Portfolio
Set tasks and self reflections

The two modules are run together
Dissertation
Dissertation aims to develop your ability to:

Research and analyse an aspect of policing in depth
Construct and present well reasoned arguments
Manage the research process
Expand your knowledge on a specific aspect of policing

Assessment: 10,000 literature based review dissertation

The Research Awareness
The Research Awareness module aims to:

Raise your awareness of the qualities associated with academic writing
Provide you with understanding of both qualitative and quantitative research methods
Provide you with insight into the limitations and benefits of different research methods

Assessment – Research Awareness Portfolio

Identifying and reviewing the literature
Undergraduates researching for a thesis or dissertation are expected to show familiarity with their topic. Usually this takes the form of a summary of the literature which demonstrates the skills to search on a subject, compile accurate and consistent bibliographies and summarize key ideas showing critical awareness. They are expected to weigh up the contribution that particular ideas, positions or approaches have made to their topic. . . . continued on next slide

Questions to ask the literature Adapted from Hart (1998, p.14)
What are the key sources?
What are the key theories, concepts and ideas?
What are the main questions and problems that have been addressed to date?
How is the knowledge of the topic structured and organized?
What are the origins and definitions of the topic?
What are the political standpoints?
What are the major issues and debates about the topic?
What are the epistemological and ontological assumptions within a body of knowledge?

Dissertation – Spotify consumer behaviour

Dissertation – Spotify consumer behaviour

Come up with a better dissertation title/question

Introduction – 1000 words max
Background information
Size of market, where Spotify comes from, etc
Comparisons to other providers, eg. apple, tidal, etc
At end of intro (the aim of this research is to….)

Literature review – 3000 words
Student/consumer behaviour on music apps

Reference list – have a URL link for each journal/article used.