Watch the following video in which Donald Clark discusses many of the recent trends in online learning and the collaborative developments that Web 2.0 tools have introduced into pedagogical paradigms from 2002-2012.
Consider that this TED talk is already several years old and innovations continue to be made- including many that you are using as students using online tools and an online learning management system.
The assigned readings for this week discussed emerging technologies and the integration of Web 2.0 platforms within the scope of online and blended instructional technology.
In your reflection paper, compare and contrast Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 technologies, emphasizing the benefits and disadvantages of each. Consider the emergence of Web 3.0, how is it different and how might it enhance learning further?
Your reflective Journals should be at least 500 words, single spaced, APA style. Please cite a minimum of one reference.
Type of service-Academic paper writing Type of assignment-Essay Subject-Education Pages / words-2 / 550 Number of sources-2 Academic level-Undergraduate Paper format-APA Line spacing-Double Language style-US English
(1) Select your own ‘focus’ subject. This can be a composer, a performer, a venue (=institution, such as a theatre, conservatoire etc), or a musical work, a genre, a specific day/week/year. You can choose either something you have come across during my lectures or a new topic of your own interest. (2) Think, through your chosen subject, how you can argue AT LEAST one of the following key issues: • Historiography (chronicles vs histories) • Globalisation • Nationalism • Post-Orientalism/ the ‘Other’ • Music as a social/political force • Class, taste and musical cultures • Genre: highbrow and lowbrow (middlebrow?) • Repertoires: canons, old, new and ‘foreign’ musics • Cultural and personal identities • Professionals and amateurs • Music, art and literature • A changing world: modernism, technologies, social transformations • Western music viewed from outside • The effects of war and censorship Marking criteria will match the learning outcomes as follows: 1,5 Information and sources 2,4 Critical analysis (Argument) 6 Historiographical understanding 3 Referencing and presentation When you successfully complete this module, you will be able to: 1 Control relevant material, both musical and nonmusical, and demonstrate effective information retrieval 2 Demonstrate concise and lucid exposition of ideas, and critically analyse and apply concepts 3 Demonstrate professional referencing and presentation 4 Understand the methods of critical investigation and writing as applied to the specified subject Guidance: To examine the overarching theme of the module, select one focus for an essay on a subject of your choice, which may be based on one or more of the key issues below. The focus might be (for example) a composer, a performer, a venue; or a piece, a genre; a day, a week, a year; a concept, an idea. You will need to devise an essay title that enables you to develop a coherent argument showing your grasp of historical method and a broader musical and cultural understanding. Your essay should draw on secondary sources as appropriate, but you must also include reference to primary sources from the period (periodicals, newspapers, memoirs etc.).
Subject Area: Hospitality 1. Identify and describe the research topic/interest. 2. Identify 10 keywords related to your topic, which you used to find the relevant literature. 3. Provide the APA reference for 6 academic sources (at least two books) which you will use in your review. 4. For each source, briefly explain how you will use it in your literature review (definitions, theoretical framework, methods, etc.)
Pick two of listed movies below, write a two-page paper for each movie describing about the movies and what issues involved that connect to our course (FINANCE)contents, and what are implications to financial managers, to the firm, and economy in general. Each 2 papers for one movie.
Choose two movies from the list below; Big Short Rogue Trader Trading Place The Wolf of Wall Street Margin Call Wall Street Wall Street: Money never sleeps Inside Job Too big to fail Arbitrage Equity Boiler Room
Character Personality Analysis (TV Series or film) Assignment to identify the main characters and assess their personality traits based on the personality theories that have been covered in class which are identified below; Psychoanalytic Neoanalytic Biological Behaviorist Cognitive Trait Humanistic/Existential Interactionist 1. Who is the main character (discuss some information about the characters background, career, family history, etc.) 2. What behaviors do you observe in the character (discuss in which scenes you observed this behavior) 3. What are the factors that influence the characters behavior (social, emotional, etc.) If this character was your client, which personality theory would you use to treat him or her and why. Please explain in detail. Note: be sure to frame your responses around theorists and theories we have covered in class. Your analysis should be in-depth and thorough , demonstrating a strong understanding of various personality theories and how they relate to the characters in the show or film.
Films and Readings to choose from.. Please choose either the first option or the second option.
Film: Quien Puede Matar a un Niño? / Who Can Kill a Child? (Narciso Ibañez Serrador, 1976) 112 min.
Reading: Lazaro-Reboll, Antonio. “Narciso Ibañez-Serrador, Horrormeister.” Spanish Horror Film. Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2012: 97-126.
Film: Zombie 2 (Lucio Fulci, 1979) 91 min
Reading: Thrower, Stephen. “Zombie!” Beyond Terror: The Films of Lucio Fulci. Guilford, Surrey: Fab Press, c1999: 14-33.
I have provided the lectures below which you will need to draw info from for this report.
* Must present an evaluation of one chapter/article. The reports should highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the chapter/article, and support their analysis with the lecture in class and the use of two or three examples from a film seen in class.
* “Reading Reports” should be approximately 4-5 pages each (not counting the cover page!). Important:* Please, note that the “Reading Reports” are in 4-5 pages double space. The purpose of this length is to learn to condense and sum up your ideas in the space provided. Therefore, I will stop marking after page 5.*
* It is imperative that you find 2 or 3 specific scenes from the movie chosen AND information from the lecture slides provided to build arguments. Clearly define strengths and weaknesses of the article as well.
Prepare a short paper (800-1000 words, 4-5 pages-double spaced, please on one of the following topics. You must make connections to course readings/films and/or class online discussions.
You should aim for at least 5 sources (course texts/films) and provide a reference list. Please use MS Word for the final assignment as I use track changes for gradings.
2) A discussion paper – Understanding Indigenous Stories and
In The Truth About Stories, Thomas King Claims, “the truth
about stories is that that’s all we are” (pg2).
Starting with your understanding of the significance of
stories, describe your understanding of Indigenous epistemologies and ways of
knowing and being. Your paper may address the following.
What is the value or significance of stories? What
does story mean to you? What are the possibilities of storywork for education? What
lessons are offered by stories? What are some of the challenges and/or
responsibilities of storywork (as taken up by Joann Archibald and/or Thomas
King)? How might stories or storywork be included in teaching?
Discuss your (developing) understandings of
Indignous thought. What can each of us learn by listening and engaging with
Indigenous epistemologies and Indigenous knowledge? What are the Implicatiions
for teaching? What might it look like when Indigenous thought comes to bear on
You should aim to include at least 5 sources (course readings/films
etch.) in your paper.