Topic: Write a paper on a government department or agency: United States Army

Description

You are equired to write a paper on a government department or agency. The topic must be cleared with the instructor by the fourth week of class. No two students may cover the same agency or department.

The paper should include the following:

1) The history of the department or agency, including when it was created and why it was created;

2) What is the function of the department or agency;

3) How does the department or agency meet this function;

4) Who is currently in charge of this agency;

5) Is this a cabinet level department or agency;

6) What are the requirements for getting a job in this department or agency;

7) Does a person have to be a United States Citizen to work in this department or agency;

8) In your opinion, does this department or agency meet their function effectively (1 or 2 paragraphs only)

Mechanics:

​The paper must be five full pages long (there should not be any half pages or unique spacing to make the paper appear longer). The font must be 12 points, double spaced and must be in Times New Roman, regular font. The paper must include a bibliography on a separate page, that is in addition to the page assignment. This means there must be five full pages and one page of a bibliography (works cited); therefore, six or more pages in total. The bibliography include five separate sources of research and include at least two news sources and one academic scholarly article. Wikipedia is not an appropriate cite and will receive an automatic 0 for the bibliography portion of the assignment if it is used or appears to be used in any fashion. WEBLINKS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE AND WILL RECEIVE 0 POINTS FOR THIS SECTION IF USED.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: The impact of key social, political and scientific developments on health status in Britain

Description

Write an essay that evaluates the impact of key developments on health status in Britain .
You should include:-
Industrialisation and urbanisation and welfare in the mid 19th century and early 20th century (social developments)
Sanitary reforms (housing, water, air, sewage and waste disposal) and Public Health Acts of the mid 19th century and early 20th century (Political developments).
The replacement of miasma and contagion theory with germ theory, the discovery of antiseptics, antibiotics and vaccines (Scientific developments)
You should discuss the relative role of legislation and reforms and scientific developments in improving health status and include the McKeown thesis (Criteria 1.2)
The major causes of death in the mid-19th century critically compared to the main causes of death today(Criteria 1.1).
You should describe the developments but you will be graded based on how well you link the developments to health status in the UK and how well you discuss the relative role of legislation and reforms and scientific developments in improving health status. All developments should be restricted to Britain.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: Russian Gulag sytem prior to 1930

Description

Paper Elements

Introduction & Thesis:

• For a 10-page paper, your introduction should not exceed one paragraph.

attached are model papers
• The purpose of your introduction is to (1) state the problem and (2) provide your thesis. It should be brief and to the point.

Body of the Paper:

• Divide your paper into manageable, relatively self-contained subsections. Each subsection will be roughly 3 pages long.

• Figure out the main points you want to make any each subsection. Each point will be developed by one or more paragraphs.

• Each paragraph should develop one idea. That idea should be introduced in the first sentence. A transition to the next idea (and next paragraph) should be expressed in the last sentence.

• To develop each idea, provide evidence in the form of factual detail, concrete examples, and argumentation.

• Explain the meaning of each fact, example, and argument. Show how they connect to the main idea of the paragraph. Use “connective tissue” throughout your paper to leave no doubt as to why you have included any fact, example, or argument.

• Each sentence should be connected to, and logically flow from, the preceding sentence. The logical connection throughout the paper should always be obvious.

• All your evidence should be linked to a paper trail with footnote references (see Essay Mechanics below).

Conclusion

• Restate your thesis with different terms. Explain why you believe you have proved it.

• Perhaps save an especially provocative insight or quotation from your research to make your point.

• Explain why what you have found out is important. Connect it to bigger issues. Place it in a broader context.

Essay Mechanics & Technical Details

You will find all the details of the proper formatting of university research papers here (also attached below)

The research paper must be typed (double-spaced). Add page numbers. Check grammar and spelling, both electronically and line by line.

Keep direct quotations brief and pithy. Identify the source (e.g. “As Trotskii wrote, . . .”)

Use past tense except to report action in a novel, assertions by living scholars, things that are still true, etc.

All assertions require supporting evidence and argumentation.

Ideas, words, or important facts taken from your sources must be footnoted with page number references.

Use footnotes (not endnotes or in-text citations), according to Turabian.

Place footnotes at the end of a sentence, never in the middle.

Give a full citation for a first mention of a work; then a brief citation (last name, a few title words, and page number/s).

Provide a bibliography at the end of your paper, including all the works cited (see Turabian).

Turn on spell-check and grammar-check; pay attention to the suggestions.

Read, reread, and revise your paper. Read it aloud. Have others read your paper. For free help with writing, contact the UIC Writing Center.

How to format your paper: Research paper formatting.pdf

Paper Rubric

Total Points: 40

Introduction (5 points)

• Set up the problem which the paper addresses. (2 points)

• State clearly what you will argue (not describe). (3 points)

Body of Paper (25 points)

• Each paragraph should be a mini-essay with: (a) a topic sentence that supports the thesis, (b) supporting information, and (c) a summary/concluding sentence which transitions to the next paragraph. (12 points)

• Primary and scholarly secondary sources should be appropriately integrated into each paragraph and buttress its topical development. (13 points. Note: failure to draw upon any primary sources — eyewitness accounts — will result in the deduction of 25 points.)

Conclusion (5 points)

• Restate the problem and explain how you proved your thesis. (2 points)

• Relate your argument to a larger point in history or to an important issue today. (3 points)

Mechanics (5 points)

• Proper grammar and punctuation. (2 points)

• Correct footnote citations and bibliography. (3 points).

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: To what extent did limitations in rational decision making shape the US decision to invade Iraq in 2003?

1,500 words however there is a 10% +/- therefore it can be 1375 or 1650

The main 3 theories to this question that need to be addressed are:
States (and other significant actors) might not be as rational as the dominant view assumes. The lecture considers three main ways through which actors might not be pursue their interests as rationally as we might think:
First, decisions are very often grounded on misperceptions (Jervis, Fearon, etc.).
Second, limits of cognition constrain “rationality” (Khong, etc.)
Third, emotions impact on reasoning (Crawford, Mercer, McDermott, etc.)

= AKA why the US acted irrational in their decision to invade Iraq and why rational decision making didn’t work. / you need to talk about how decisions are very often grounded on misperceptions and not supported by hard evidence
– Limits of cognition constrain rationality
– How emotions impact reasoning
– If you really want to understand this event (why US invaded iraq 2003) you first have to look at the security interests and the national security interests of the major powers involved
– cognitive processes = people tend to have or try to have a consistent coherent visions of a situation = they have simplistic visions of a situation i.e. how invading iraq would play out)

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Analysis, War, and Decision: Why Intelligence Failures Are Inevitable

Analysis, War, and Decision: Why Intelligence Failures Are Inevitable
Failure in intelligence regularly happens at an essential political loss resulting in an overwhelming loss of life like terrorist attacks. Intelligence failure directly on the shoulder of consumers claims that critical mistakes have been made by raw information collectors who produce complete analysis that consumes the intelligence services products (Thomas & David 137).
As a result, intelligence institution does not allow room for improvement; instead, they believe in the flaws of political areas which are critical and offers an understanding framework where solutions to failures occur. Therefore, the analysis of intelligence failure is developed to create a normative theory of understanding how war can get prevented.
The challenges of providing attack warnings hereditary the predicting and discerning enemy intentions of surprise attacks such as the evidence of the intended attack and pearl harbor. Additionally, the characteristic of the available intelligence before attacks had policymaker inability that did not accept the urgency of information due to prevailing inconsistent assumptions and estimates (Immerman 1-23).
Therefore, examining the disconnect between analysis in utilizing intelligence and policymakers for evaluations has drawn much insight into practices during the war finding the review to succeed in fatal and tactical operations.
Obstacles to successful analysis get identified as the ambivalence of judgment, the ambiguity of evidence, and the atrophy of reforms where the uncertainty of proof includes conflicting and inadequate intelligence. The analysis can oversimplify the ambiguity significance that allows the policymaker to understand the indecision within the knowledge.
Therefore, the ambiguity becomes pervasive like both analyst and decision-maker in the association of intuition to compensate for the unclear intelligence.
Work Cited
Immerman, Richard H. “Intelligence and strategy: historicizing psychology, policy, and politics.” Diplomatic History 32.1 (2008): 1-23.
Thomas, David L. “Proving constructive possession in Virginia: a change in the tradewinds.” Colonial Law. 18 (1989): 137.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: Political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Voting Behaviors among college students in US

Voting Behaviors among college students in US
US higher education has accepted the responsibility to educate students in the participation of social activities that serve the college students annually and carry the potential of creating an environment that encourages students’ engagements.
However, measuring student’s civic engagement becomes an essential step of understanding the learning and conservational conditions that raise college students in political discourse, knowledge participation, and equity. Therefore, voting marks a critical step for measuring the college student’s civic engagement and interest through combining the enrollment records that are publicly available for voting (Foos &Florian 285,).
Colleges support students who lead voter’s mobilization efforts in long term alliances and opposes the provisional ones to ensure that elections nurture democratic learning, skills, norms, and commitments that last beyond the election season (Mitchell & Matthew 70).
The alliance can be sufficient to the goal of widespread on the ongoing effect that gets easily achieved when the charges come from the leaders of the institution in identifying and clarifying the co-chair and coalition purpose. As a result, the institution should have the ability to engage numerous constituents across the colleges so that they can reach political perspectives and social identities.
Active alliance in US colleges employs collaborative practices that include tapping into existing resources, establishing roadmaps for action, and applying the best practices for discussing, organizing, and focusing on the fair reports of the process.
Colleges also train their students to register voters recommended by partnership student volunteers through assembling the work on behalf of the institution and engaging in challenging discussions. College members who mobilize voters for parties, candidates are not compelled instead are invited to participate in the training session.

Work Cited
Foos, Florian, and Peter John. “Parties are no civic charities: voter contact and the changing partisan composition of the electorate.” Political Science Research and Methods 6.2 (2018): 283-298.
Mitchell, Matthew I. “Land Conflict and Electoral Violence in Côte d’Ivoire: A Micro-Level Analysis.” Violence in African Elections: Between Democracy and Big Man Politics, edited by Mimmi Söderberg Kovacs and Jesper Bjarnesen (2018): 67-86.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: Political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: Should the Government promote or control developments in machine learning and AI

Description

Should the Government promote or control developments in
machine learning and AI?
It will have 4,000 words maximum. Whilst the focus of the essay is likely to be machine
learning and Artificial Intelligence, the student may wish to focus on specific areas, that
is a type of application and/or technologies and/or a specific type of organisation.
Choose an area you already have some familiarity with (perhaps you are working in or
regularly engage with) or strategically you would like to understand for your future
research. The review should be critically evaluative, that is, it should be critically
framed, using the literature and other resources, to bring together arguments that
support and question what is going on. In other words, just a description is not
sufficient. The evaluative review should broadly include the following sections:
▪ a half page abstract summarising the main points;
▪ with reference to the key literature, an introduction to the topic, its historical context
and why any particular application area, technologies and/or type of organisation
was chosen;
▪ an short explanation of the approach (methodology) used to produce the review;
▪ a presentation of the main elements (and their dynamics) of the aspects that you
are focusing on together with a consideration of the pros and cons;
▪ a critical discussion of the relevant data ecology and impacts for data science and
on society;
▪ draw your conclusions and any hypotheses you may raise for further research;
▪ a list of references cited in the text according to the Harvard convention.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: english

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: white supremacy terrorist threat and wildfire threat to national security

Description

Research and detail natural threats to security.

Aside from an introduction and conclusion the paper at a minimum must include content answering the following questions:

1-What are the two most significant natural threats facing the United States? List and discuss in detail.

2-What are examples of the most damaging incidents for the two natural threats already identified?

3-What steps/programs were taken by the government to deal with these two threats?

4-What were the two most effective steps/programs.

5-Why is this important to you?

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY

Topic: WAR and Conflict ın realism theory.

Description

WAR and Conflict ın realism theory mention and get sources from Realists such as Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes and other realist thinkers . And also please link ıt to recent days as well

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: political science

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

Get DISCOUNT BUY ESSAY