argue why an invention (material or intellectual) changed humankind.


Could you write about how Internet changed humankind.
Write 5 paragraphs: introduction, 3 body paragraphs and conclusion.
This is an argumentative essay (it should not be descriptive or expository)
In the introduction state your thesis clearly (what will you be arguing?) “x is true because a, b and c”
Each body paragraph should express one argument to support the thesis.
In the conclusion, repeat your thesis and explain how you have demonstrated its veracity through the supporting arguments.
Wikipedia does not count as a source

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-1 / 275
Academic level-Sophomore (College 2nd year)
Paper format-MLA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

why us bestessayhelp



start by setting up the issue, then discuss some arguments for and against the views of evidentialism and pragmatism. Then, for the rest of the paper, take a stand on the issue.

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-1 / 275
Academic level-Sophomore (College 2nd year)
Paper format-MLA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

same day essays

Topic: The Impact of the Telegraph on Society


Research requirements:
• 6 scholarly sources

Format requirements:
• Chicago-Style Citation
• Double space your essay.
• Use 12-point Times New Roman
• Use standard margins (in other words, please do not increase or decrease the margins)
• Do not use more than a couple subheadings (best to use none)
• Number text pages in lower right
• Include an alphabetical WORKS CITED or BIBLIOGRAPHY page at the end. You do not need to include annotations with your bibliography entries.

Topic: The Impact of the Telegraph on Society

focusing mainly on Morse & his work and time & place. Target your research around Morse

Thesis: Samuel F. B. Morse invented electromagnetic technology and paved the roads of electrical communication for the modern world. The infamous message, “What hath God wrough?” is truly a gift to humankind. The telegraph was widespread by 1850s and affected the Civic War. Telegraphy is the pillar of communication technologies and influences modern society.

BIBLIOGRAPHY (see attachment for PDFs)

1. A Cognitive Analysis of Component-Stimulated Invention: Electromagnet, Telegraph, and the Capitol Dome’s Electric Gas-Lighter by Michael Brian Schiffer

2. Listening in the dark: audio surveillance, communication technologies, and the submarine threat during the First World War
Elizabeth Bruton &Paul Coleman

3. Sounds and repercussions of war: mobilization, invention, and conversion of First World War science in Britain, France and Germany by Arne Schirrmacher
Pages 269-292 | Published online: 09 Oct 2016

same day essays

Topic: Do you consider alcohol a drug?


1. Do you consider alcohol a drug? Should greater controls be placed on the sale of alcohol?

2- Do TV shows and films glorify drug usage and encourage youths to enter the drug trade?

Should all images of drinking and smoking be banned from TV?

What about advertisements that try to convince youths how much fun it is to drink beer or smoke cigarettes?

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Coursework
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-1 / 275
Number of sources-1
Academic level-Junior (College 3rd year)
Paper format-APA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

claim your discount

Topic: The Body Politic: Body Image Issues

Research notes and tips!

Course Description:

This course examines the body as a site of governance in politics and public policy. Through the study ofgroups of bodies (e.g., radicalized bodies, Indigenous bodies, pregnant bodies) and body parts (e.g., blood,teeth, organs) the course identifies critical links between embodiment, politics, and power.


Final research paper: Students will complete a final assignment on a topic of their choosing, justifying their choice of topic in relation to course themes.

Please include:

• A title and title page (page numbers, and word count at the end)

• Sources: At least 7or morecoursereadings, one of which must be a primary source

• Citations and a bibliography (APA style)

•Primary and Secondary sources only (articles, books, etc)

•Marking Criteria: 1) engagement with at least 4course themes; 2) writing and organization; 3) creative, thoughtful analysis that brings course themes together.

Key Details/Reminders:

Length: 2000 words/8 pages double spaced.

• Style: Times New Roman, 12 pt. font.

• The essay should be written in full academic prose (with footnotes or bibliography)


Title:The Body Politic: Body Image Issues

Research Question:Please create a strong thesisthat address the ways in which the course themes affect the ways women view their bodies.

Please send completed paper to my email:

Course themes to be discussed in Essay:(CHOOSE 4)

  1. Theme1: Wrong Bodies and “Ideal” Citizens

Topics/key questions to consider/help with essay

  • Where does the notion of the “ideal body” come from?
  • What does Sullivan (and others) mean by “the wrong body”?
  • What is the relationship between physical embodiment, morality, and access tothe rights of citizenship?

Readings to be discussed in Essay (choose the ones relevant to the thesis)

  • (LN) Rose, Nikolas, and Carlos Novas. 2005. “Biological Citizenship.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier, 439–463. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • (LN) Bacchi, Carol Lee, and Chris Beasley. “Citizen Bodies: Is Embodied Citizenship a Contradiction in Terms?” Critical Social Policy 22, no. 2 (2002): 324–52.
  • (LN) Sullivan, Nikki. “The Role of Medicine in the (Trans)Formation of `Wrong’

Bodies.” Body & Society 14, no. 1 (2008): 105–16.

  • (ON) Elliot, Carl. 2000. “A New Way to Be Mad.” The Atlantic.
  • Theme 2: Invisibility- Teeth

Topics/key questions to consider/help with essay

  • What do “beautiful” teeth look like? Are they the same as “healthy” teeth? What
  • institutions and structures enable this view?
  • What is the relationship between oral health, poverty, and social justice?

Readings to be discussed in Essay (choose the ones relevant to the thesis)

  • (ON) Smarsh, Sarah. “There is No Shame Worse Than Poor Teeth in a Rich World.” Aeon Magazine. 23 October 2014. than-poor-teeth-in-a-rich-world.
  • (ON) Glasser, Hana. 2017. “An Adorable Swedish Tradition Has its Roots in HumanExperimentation.”
  • (LN) Khalid, Abeer, and Carlos Quiñonez. 2015. “Straight, White Teeth as a SocialPrerogative.” Sociology of Health & Illness 37.5: 782–96.
  • (ON) Kingston, Anne. “How Bad Teeth Are at the Root of Income Inequality in
  • Canada.” Maclean’s. 6 November 2017.
  • (ON) Zelinker, Rachel. “Lack of community dental services takes painful toll onNunavut community.” CBC Online 26 August 2016.
  • Theme 3:Disposability: Racialized Bodies

Topics/key questions to consider/help with essay

  • How do we come to understand certain groups and individuals as “racialized”?What does racialized even mean?
  • How do social structures and institutions create racialized experiences? (e.g., whywas what occurred in Africville legal?)
  • How do, following Razack, do populations come to be read as “disposable”? Whatdoes that mean for individuals? How is disposability read onto the body?

Readings to be discussed in Essay (choose the ones relevant to the thesis)

  • LN) Thompson, Debra. 2016. “Transnational Biological Racialism.” The SchematicState. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 50-91.
  • (LN) Nelson, Jennifer J. 2000. “The Space of Africville: Creating, Regulating, andRemembering the Urban ‘Slum’.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 15(2): 163-185.
  • (LN) Razack, Sherene. 2017. “Human Waste and the Border: A Vignette.” Law,Culture and the Humanities. pp. 1-13.
  • (LN) Mitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. “The Eugenic Atlantic: Race,Disability and the Making of and International Science.” In Cultural Locations ofDisability, 100–129. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
  • (ON) Moniruzzaman, Monir, Heather Dewey-Hagborg, Camille Tuner, et. al. SpareParts.
  • Theme 4: Disposability: Skin

Topics/key questions to consider/help with essay

  • What is the relationship between purity, whiteness, skin, and morality? How hasthat relationship been constructed through imperial, racist, and colonial projects?
  • Following Ahmed and Stacey, “How does the skin come to be written andnarrated? How is the skin managed by subjects, others, and nations?” (2).
  • What does skin have to do with the “human-ness” of an individual?

Readings to be discussed in Essay (choose the ones relevant to the thesis)

  • (LN) Ahmed, Sara and Jackie Stacey. 2001. “Introduction: Dermographies.”Thinking Through the Skin. London: Routledge. pp. 1-17.
  • (LN) Lafrance, Marc and R. Scott Carey. 2018. “Skin Work: Understanding theEmbodied Experience of Acne.” Body and Society 24.1-2: 55-87.
  • (LN) McClintock, Anne. 1995. “Soft-Soaping Empire: Commodity Racism andImperial Advertising.” Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in ColonialContest. London: Routledge. pp. 207-231.
  • (ON) Jacobsen, Rowan. 2019. “Is Sunscreen the New Margarine.” OutsideMagazine.
  • (LN) Scott, Rebecca. 2011. “Body Worlds’ Plastinates, the Human/NonhumanInterface, and Feminism.” Feminist Theory 12.2: 165–81.
  • Theme 5: Risk/Responsibility I: The Pregnant Body

Topics/key questions to consider/help with essay

  • How have pregnant people come to be responsible for the potential future harms faced by their children? How do understandings of gender, race, class, dis/ability, Indigeneity create new pressures on women to “protect” fetuses and children yet-to-be conceived?

Readings to be discussed in Essay (choose the ones relevant to the thesis)

  • (LN) MacKendrick, Norah.2014. “More Work for Mother Chemical Body Burdensas a Maternal Responsibility.” Gender & Society 28.5: 705-728.
  • (LN) Daniels, Cynthia R. 1997. “Between Fathers and Fetuses: The SocialConstruction of Male Reproduction and the Politics of Fetal Harm.” Signs 22.3:579–616.
  • (LN) Mamo, Laura. “Fertility Inc.” In Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Heatlh, andIllness in the U.S., edited by Adele E. Clarke, Laura Mamo, Jennifer Ruth Fosket,Jennifer R. Fishman, and Janet K. Shim, 173–96. Durham and London: DukeUniversity Press, 2010.
  • (LN) Salmon, Amy. 2011. “Aboriginal Mothering, FASD Prevention and theContestations of Neoliberal Citizenship.” Critical Public Health 21. 2 (2011): 165–78.
  • (ON) Solnit, Rebecca. 2016. “The Case of the Missing Perpetrator.” On MysteriousPregnancies, The Passive Voice, and Disappearing Men.

Topic: Argumentative Essay


You will write an argumentative essay, one that will argue whether alternatives to evolution theory need to be taught in public schools or not. Read volume 15, issue 27 (July 29, 2005) of the CQ Researcher (Congressional Quarterly Researcher) paying particular attention to the “pro/con” debate on page 653.

Should alternatives to evolution theory be taught? One side says yes, the other side says no.

Choose which side of the argument you agree with and argue, in YOUR essay, why you support that side. Do not take the middle road—you must choose a side. Your essay needs to be between 1000-1200 words telling whether or not alternatives to evolutionary theory should be taught in public schools. Your essay needs to be double-spaced, with a title. Your name, the course number, my name (Dr. Jones) and the date need to be in the upper left hand corner of your submission. Review this sample. Do not use contractions, the word “you” in your essay or the words “a lot.”

Use two documented sources from books or journals found only in the LSUA library. One documented source can be the CQ Researcher. The Purdue University OWL site will show you how to cite sources in a Works Cited or a References page.

Topic: assessments Instruments to assess play

For this Assignment, you will put theory into practice by using your research from Week 4 Assignment 1 to guide you. Traditionally, observation has been one of the most used types of assessments in early childhood. This has both benefits and limitations.

One serious issue with observation is assumption by the observer. This often occurs when there is no clear purpose established before the observation. In other words, a specific purpose for the observation has not been established.

By examining two different age groups for the same skill or developmental area, you can make comparisons on not only the area observed, but also on the effectiveness of the assessment(s).

As educators, you must be cognizant of the strengths and weaknesses of the assessments you use, as well as their intended purpose. There is no one-size-fits-all in early childhood education. The two age groups will be: first age group: 4 year olds and second age group will be 5 year olds.

To prepare:

  • Before completing your observations, review the Required Media found in the Learning Resources of this module.
  • Research, then select or create an instrument based on your research used for observing children at play to identify a selected skill, developmental area, or other. Use this instrument during your observations. You may elect to use the same instrument, if appropriate, or select an instrument for each grade group, but this instrument should measure the same skill or area for both groups (total of two instruments, one for the younger group and one for the older group).

Upon completion of your observations:

  • Reflect on your observation of two different children at play. What developmental or emerging content knowledge did you note? How do you know this is accurate?
  • Examine your notes and reflect on the content. Were these accurate facts or were personal thoughts and feelings reflected? How could you improve your personal observations?

Submit an analysis that addresses the following:

  • What were the strengths and weaknesses of the instrument(s) you found or created for observing play?
  • Should the instruments have been modified? Why or why not?
  • How could you share this information with families or with colleagues as a teacher leader?
  • Clearly identify the purpose of the observation and explain how you considered culturally responsive practice.
  • How do you know your assessment practices are fair and equitable?
  • How do you know this is developmentally appropriate (DAP)?
  • How do you target skills to be assessed?
  • How do you schedule assessments, and what are these (content)?

Complete a 2- to 3-page analysis using your research, and include a copy of the selected instrument. Page length does not include title page, reference page, or instrument for assessment.

Cite your research and provide appropriate references in APA format to substantiate your thinking.

Topic: Women Sexuality Studies – Sex, Violence and Hollywood

After watching clips of This Film is Not Yet Rated, author an original post, of at least 350-words, relating one or more points raised in the documentary to course readings, then author at least 150-words replies to two different colleagues’ posts.

Note that greetings and effusive or general praise for a given post do not count toward word-count requirement nor do they take the place of thoughtful engagement with the ideas themselves. Original posts and replies must feature proper spelling, complete sentences, and, generally, correct grammar. Rules of Netiquette must also be followed.

Questions to consider may include, but are not limited to the following:
Were you aware of the more restrictive ratings given to films featuring sexuality compared to violence?

Is the normalization of violence, compared to the taboo nature of consenting sexuality, problematic?
Do you know anyone who is more uncomfortable with displays of affection or sex than violence?
Can you think of recent film experiences that shows how some are more concerned with sex compared to violence?
What do you think about how the treatment of sex and violence in the ratings system? Should it be changed, and if so, how so?
Should all sex be treated the same in a given rating system?
How does the more restrictive treatment of sex compared to violence relate to the idea of cultural hegemony?
Should consensual, sexually explicit content be given more restrictive ratings than violent content?
Is media violence a serious issue we should concern ourselves with?
Given the impact advertisement has on consumption—our consumer choices—on what grounds can we say that entertainment media has no or limited influence on society?
Should all forms of violence be treated the same? What are the differences between representations of violence and why do those differences matter or not matter?
Should bloodless violence receive more restrictive or less restrictive ratings than real-life portrayals of violence? What about entertaining portrayals of violence?
Is sympathetic or cathartic violence edifying in a way that entertaining violence isn’t? Should the two be rated the same?

Topic: American Public Controversy (Please do marijuana legalization)

Additional features

1-page summary Provide 275 words summarizing the paper and upload it in a separate file


The subject matter and argumentative direction of your research argument are open to your choice. You must, however, research and write about a matter of contemporary American public controversy.

In recent classes, students have written about gun control, immigration policy, educational access, environmental concerns, and stem-cell research—just to name a few potential topics. Due to the complexity of many of these areas of controversy, you’ll want to identify a subject that you are passionate about early in the course and begin accumulating resources and refining your views.

I recommend that you develop a series of research questions that will help you to clarify your position and organize your writing.

ENC1102: Rhetoric and Research Research Argument Guidelines Overview: An important goal of ENC 1102 is to equip you with the writing and research skills to compose a clear, coherent, and engaging research argument. A traditional approach to writing a longer essay includes a process of:

o Generating a topic and identifying a clear, defendable thesis.

o Accumulating and evaluating solid academic and popular (news) resources.

o Organizing a coherent argument (often from an outline) with an introduction, body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion.

o Working through a recursive drafting process that includes a rough draft, a preliminary draft, and a final draft.

Topics: The subject matter and argumentative direction of your research argument are open to your choice. You must, however, research and write about a matter of contemporary American public controversy. In recent classes, students have written about gun control, immigration policy, educational access, environmental concerns, and stem-cell research—just to name a few potential topics.

Due to the complexity of many of these areas of controversy, you’ll want to identify a subject that you are passionate about early in the course and begin accumulating resources and refining your views. I recommend that you develop a series of research questions that will help you to clarify your position and organize your writing.

Composition Guidelines: • Your research argument should be ten pages in length. Because you will also include a “Works Cited” page at the conclusion of your work, the final document that you submit for a grade will stretch to eleven total pages in length. • You need to incorporate a minimum of at least ten resources in supporting your work. I recommend a mixture of academic resources (journal articles, reference texts, or chapters from academic books) and popular resources (newspaper and magazine articles, TED Talks, or podcasts) for your essay. • Your essay must be formatted to meet MLA standards. Please review Module Five for information on citing resources with MLA documentation principles. • Please use either the Times New Roman or the Courier New font for your work. Depending on the length of your essay, you can use 10, 10.5, 11, 11.5, or (preferably) 12-pt font size. Your work should be double spaced. Please do not include an extra space between paragraphs. • Do not include a cover page for this assignment (some instructors may ask for one in other classes). • Up to three reasonably sized images (charts, graphs, and photographs) are acceptable. Please re-size them so that the images are not pixelated, and center them in your document with text above and below. Label them Figure 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3 (for images) or Table 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3 (for charts and graphs). You can use both images and charts, of course, but just make sure that you label them accordingly. Assignment Deadline: • Consult the calendar in the course syllabus for the appropriate assignment deadline and submission method.

Topic: Rogerian Argumentative Essay On Marijuana


This essay must take 3 opposing viewpoints (for medical marijuana legalization, for general marijuana legalization, and against marijuana legalization) and come to a compromise in a Rogerian style argument. All sides must be taken into account neutrally, and a better compromise that leaves all sides fairly must be met.

1102 Term Paper Guidelines: Arguing a Position
Why would I make you do this?
Well, you argue positions daily – you just might not realize it. This assignment will assist you both in this
class and outside of it. You will practice choosing a position, analyzing it, articulating why the position
matters, and defending it. For purposes of this class, you will practice responding to rhetorical
situations, developing your analytic skills, and other objectives of this course.
What am I making you do?
This paper will be a multi-stage process. Any paper you write should be a multi-stage process. Each
building block (or stage) will require you to submit something on D2L or bring something to class. These
stages will culminate in your final product which will need to be submitted through D2L.
For this assignment, you will choose a multi-dimensional social issue. Once you have selected a topic,
you will choose three clear positions to explore. Your final product will be a Rogerian style argument
paper attempting to find a compromise between the three divergent positions. You must explore all
positions and defend your compromise using peer-reviewed, academic resources.
Choosing a topic can be challenging. Eventually, you will have classes wherein you will choose topics and
positions completely on your own. For this paper, I am giving you options to choose from. However, if
you have an idea that you want to explore that isn’t on this list, you may discuss it with me during my
office hours. Regardless of your topic, remember that you will need a clear, singular position.
Topics and Positions:

  • College
    o College attendance should be required because…
    o Students should be encouraged to pursue trade professions because…
    o College attendance should be free [how and why]
    o College tuition rates should be capped at [some monetary limit] to encourage lowincome
    students to attend [how and why]
    o The core curriculum should be altered [how and why]
  • Pre-college education
    o Transgender athletes should (or should not) be required to use the locker room for their
    birth-assigned gender
    o Transgender athletes should (or should not) be allowed to compete in sports (consider a
    specific sport) with their identified gender
    o Home schooled students should be required to [take part in extracurricular activities/be
    involved in volunteer work]
  • Alcohol/Marijuana/tobacco/etc…
    o The minimum drinking age should be lowered to 18 because…
    o Marijuana should (or should not) be legalized for [age group or type of use] because…
    o Smoking in public places (should or should not) be banned
    o Energy drinks should not be sold to people under the age of [14/15/16/17/18] because…
  • Technology and Social Media
    o People should limit their social media usage to [specific amount] because…
    o Parents should limit screen time of their children to [specific amount]because…
    o People should use [specific social media or technological tool] more to [do something
    globalization related]
    o Employees should not be accessible outside of work hours by phone or email because…
    o Modern advertising promotes body dysmorphia; consequently [something should be
  • o You’ve had two weeks to begin your research and topic exploration. During this time,
    hopefully you’ve continued researching and taking notes from those resources. If you
    annotated your resources while researching, then this should be a piece of cake. An
    annotated bibliography helps you keep track of your sources and reminds you what you
    liked and disliked about them. An annotated bibliography will help when it comes time
    to write your outline and paper.
    o Your annotated bibliography should include at least eight sources. At least six of your
    sources must be academic, peer reviewed journal articles.
    o Each source will be worth 2 point, MLA formatting is worth 3 points, and your thesis is
    worth 1 point.
    o Your annotated bibliography should be structured like an outline and include:
    ▪ Your thesis at the top of the page
     All of your sources should connect back to the thesis – either supporting
    it or highlighting alternatives
    ▪ Correct MLA citation of the resource followed by a bulleted list responding to
    the following questions
     Authority of the author of the resource
    o Are they an expert in their field? Do they have a related degree?
    Are they being paid to say what they’re saying?
     The Argument or Purpose of the resource
    o What is the source saying? Why did the author bother writing
    o This should be a sentence or two.
     Relation to other Sources
    o How does this resource connect to your bigger picture? Is this
    supporting your argument, supporting another source on your
    list, or providing an alternative perspective?
     Major Bias of the resource
    o Is the resource neutral, arguing for a specific position, or
    arguing against one?
     Audience/level
    o Who is expected to read this source? Is it written so a layman
    could understand it or is prior subject knowledge expected?
    What is the source’s tone?
     Notes and quotes you want to remember
    o What does the source say? Are there any key quotes you want
    to make sure you remember (consider citing them)?
  • Rough Draft (20pts) Due: In Class Thursday, 12 March 2020
    o This means writing your paper. A rough draft is typically ~60% of the final product, but
    that percentage is really subjective. For you, think about how much feedback you want.
    If you have almost nothing written, then there’s almost nothing a reviewer can say.
    o This is where having a detailed outline (or annotated bibliography) comes in handy. You
    can take your outline and begin filling in the blanks. Turn your quotes into paraphrases
    or supporting material and develop your own argument.
    o You will need to bring TWO copies of your rough draft to class on the due date. One to
    turn in and one to peer review.
    o Your grade will be dependent upon:
    ▪ Did you bring 2 copies to class? (2 pts)
    ▪ Is your thesis clear and within your introduction? (2pts)
    ▪ Are you using a variety of resources? (4pts)
    ▪ Are you acknowledging alternative perspectives? (2pts)
    ▪ Are your in-text citations correct according to MLA format? (4pts)
    ▪ Do you have in-text citations and a works cited page? (3 pts)
    ▪ Is your Works Cited page correct according to MLA format? (3pts)
    o Although grammar and syntax are vital all the time, this is a rough draft, so grammar will
    not be a factor in your points.
    o Be aware, I will not have time to give detailed feedback on your rough draft before the
    final deadline. All I will be looking at in your rough draft are the details listed here in the
    “your grade will be dependent upon:” section. I strongly encourage you to make
    thorough use of peer review and the UNG writing center.
  • Peer Review (10pts) Due: In Class Thursday, 12 March 2020
    o Peer review is an opportunity for you to edit a classmate’s paper and have yours edited
    in return. Having any work critiqued can be rough, but it is a necessary part of the
    process of improvement.
    o Your grade will be dependent upon your review of a classmate’s paper.
    o Peer review should be a positive process; you are discussing how to improve and what
    was done well. No review should ever be full of negative feedback. Tone is also
    important, think about how you would feel if you were told or read the same feedback
    in the same way – structure your feedback accordingly.
  • Final Paper (70 pts) Due: 11:59 Sunday 15 March 2020 in D2L
    o Your final product should be a well written Rogerian argument persuading a reader
    (me) to a particular compromise (your thesis).
    o Requirements:
    ▪ 1,500-2,000 words (not including the heading, title, or works cited)
    ▪ MLA Format
    ▪ Minimum 6 academic, peer reviewed journal article sources
    ▪ Submitted in D2L by 11:59pm on the Due Date
    ▪ Consider referring to the syllabus’ “What makes a good paper” section