Topic: Iran Arranged Marriages Compared to United States Love Marriage

Additional features

Draft required 3 pages + well-structured + cited references


Compare and contrast Iran Arranged marriages to United States love marriages

Must use the book “Rooftops of Tehran” as a specific source and it must RELATE from the book.

Sources used must be from scholarly peer reviewed sources.

In the paper, use and document in MLA format at least one direct quote, one paraphrase, and one summary from each source.

Include 1-2 block or long quotations (direct quotes of more than four lines). Use correct format for block quotes

Must have works cited page in MLA format and use proper manuscript form for the entire essay.

Refer to uploaded document for additional details.

why us bestessayhelp

Topic: Taylor’s theory and theory X and Y


1000 words for each question

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Frederick Taylor’s theory of Scientific Management?

Using examples, discuss its relevance to work and management in the modern organisation.

Douglas McGregor challenged the Scientific Management school of thought by proposing two distinct views of human beings: Theory X and Theory Y.

Describe and contrast these opposing views and, using examples, discuss their relevance to management in the modern workplace.

same day essays

Topic: inter-professional working


1. Identify and compare examples of inter-professional working in various health and social care
contexts. Examples of inter-professional working , care in the community, care in acute settings,
service users, carers and the voluntary sector, maternity and infant care, mental health care
2. Analyse how the policy of putting patients at the heart of inter-professional working can be
achieved in practice. Patients at the heart of inter-professional working. Building collaborative
relationships among professionals, patients, carers and communities. Leading collaboration, finding
the right partner, developing collaborative relationships, capture and sharing learning. Changing
existing ways of working and embedding collaborative activity in organisational culture

Topic: Do what YOU want day gardening


Students are required to complete each of the assignments below.
Do what YOU want day (50pts): The purpose of this assignment is for you to identify and intentionally participate in a recreation, leisure, or play experience that is something you have never done before, but have always wanted to.

You must get the instructor’s approval prior to participation. Submit a three page paper that describes the activity, and how the activity met the definition of recreation, leisure, or play.

In addition the paper must: 1) include a photo of you participating in your chosen activity, on the day you participate;
2) Summarize your insight gained about the importance of doing something recreation, leisure, or play related for yourself.

Your Score
Identify and participate in a recreation, leisure or play experience that is something you have NEVER participated in before-
 Describe the activity
o State how this activity fits the definitions of recreation, leisure, or
 Include a photo of yourself participating in the activity.
Summarize what you learned by participating in the activity
 How did participation in this activity influence you?
 What did you learn about the importance of doing something
recreation, leisure, or play related for yourself?

Your report must be at least three full, double spaced, typed pages (12pt font, 1” margins); and must have an introduction, main body, and conclusion, include a minimum of 2 sources outside of class material and synthesis of course content to demonstrate your learning. In paper Citations…or a Reference page.
. Your report must be free from grammatical and spelling errors, and demonstrate acceptable college level writing and critical thinking.

Topic: health industry in Canada research report

Report Descriptions: For these assignments, you will write concise (5-10 pp.), well researched, well-written reports that address key issues in the industrial sector of your choice. Your goal, in short, is to know your industry better than anybody competing with you for the positions you are applying for after you graduate. The issues you will research: 1. Overall Industry Scan 2. Legal / Regulation / Governmental constraints 3. Mass Media 4. Social / Digital Media 5. The future of business communications Guidelines: • Explain the topic and some background (include why you’ve chosen this topic). (reports 1) • Describe the role these issues play in your industry’s / organization’s competitive environment. (reports 2 – 5) • Describe the sources of information you used. (reports 1 – 5) • Use examples (incidents, websites, journalism, digital media platforms/utilities) to demonstrate how these issues have made an impact on your industry / organization. (reports 2 – 5) • Include visual elements: Headings, lists (where applicable), and graphics (where appropriate). (reports 1 – 5) Report 1: Overall Industry Sector Scan For these assignments, you will write concise (5-10 pp.), well researched, well-written report to me that address key issues in the industrial sector of your choice. Your goal, in short, is to know your industry better than anybody competing with you for the positions you are applying for after you graduate. In this report you will provide an overall environmental scan of the sector you have chosen, to give me an understanding of your focus and interests. Composition Guidelines: In a properly organized report (see p. 61 in Plain Language Style Guide and handout below for correct format), using proper sentence structure (that is, not point form): Explain the topic and some background (include why you’ve chosen this topic). Point out the main issues you that have affected this industry in the last twenty years, in Canada and throughout the world. Describe the sources of information you used. Explain the challenges a student or entrepreneur has when finding important information regarding this industry. Include visual elements: Headings, lists (where applicable), and graphics (where appropriate). Report 2: Legal / Regulation / Governmental Constraints Describe the Legal / Regulatory / Government constraints and issues within the industry that you have chosen. Report 3: Mass Media For your third report describe how your industry sector is depicted by mass media, in Canada and elsewhere. Mass media’s influence is enormous, or course, in determining public opinion and capital investment. Report 4: Social / Digital Media Describe how social / digital media “governance” is done within your industrial sector. Report 5: The future of Business Communications For the fifth report use both popular media and academic sources to present a potential future perspective of business communications.

Type of service: Academic paper writing

Type of assignment: Writing from scratch

Subject: healthcare

Pages / words: 4 / 1100

Number of sources: 2

Academic level: Undergraduate

Paper format: MLA

Line spacing: Double

Language style: US English

[maxbutton id=”1″] [maxbutton id=”2″]

Topic: In Canada, is two-tier MRI just? Was it morally permissible for Sanders’ father to purchase a private MRI for his son?

Write an essay on the following:
In Canada, is two-tier MRI just? Was it morally permissible for Sanders’ father to purchase a private MRI for his son? In answering this second question, assume, for the sake of argument, that two-tier MRI is unjust in Canada.
In answering this question, be sure to define key terms, briefly explain the case of Sanders, and clearly state your thesis. In addition to giving your arguments for your views, be sure to consider a spectrum of opposing views, and explain why the arguments for those views fail. For example, if you are arguing that 2-tier is sometimes permissible, be sure also to consider arguments from the libertarian and egalitarian perspectives, and explain why they fail. Also, be sure to consider objections to your arguments, and explain why they fail.
Essays should be clearly referenced (in text, author’s last name, and page number), and should draw at least in part on some of the arguments presented in some of the course readings.
It may be helpful to assume that you are writing for an intelligent, open-minded audience, and you are trying to argue why your view of the matter is correct or most rationally justified. Indeed, it might help to assume that your audience is slightly leaning to the opposing side, and so you will need to work hard to explain why the opposing arguments fail and why your side has the better reasons behind it. Remember to be self-critical; think of possible weak spots in your argument; raise challenges to your argument, and explain how your argument can be defended against those challenges.
1. introduction with a brief description of Marissa’s case, and a clear thesis that answers the assigned question, e.g., ​I will argue that Marissa’s abortion was (or was not) wrong.
2. developed argument for the​ opposing side,​ stated precisely and explained in a fair and thorough manner
3. targeted objection to that opposing argument (if 2 objections, then 2 paragraphs)
4. another argument that a rival may make, stated precisely, explained fairly and thoroughly
5. why that argument fails.
6. favored argument for one’s own view, stated precisely and explained, and applied to Marissa’s case
7. targeted objection to one’s favored argument
8. thoughtful response to that argument
9. possibly another objection to one’s favored argument
10.thoughtful response to that argument
11.conclusion that briefly restates the main point of the paper
10.demonstrates a grasp of some of the relevant literature (not just the textbook or my online lessons, but also the assigned readings on abortion)
11.demonstrates fairness (to opposing views and to critics of one’s favored argument)
12.demonstrates thoughtfulness (especially when it comes to one’s favored argument, and any problems it might face)
14.clear organization — be sure paragraphs are used carefully, with each argument given in its own paragraph, each objection in its own paragraph, etc. STUDENTS SHOULD NOT PRESENT AND REJECT AN ARGUMENT IN ONE PARAGRAPH. STUDENTS SHOULD NOT RAISE 2 PROBLEMS IN 1 PARAGRAPH. EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE IN ITS PROPER PLACE, SO THAT EACH IDEA IS DEVELOPED AND CLEARLY EXPLAINED
15.originality — it is always nice to see a student considering a novel argument on the topic, provided that they develop it carefully and think critically about it.

[maxbutton id=”1″] [maxbutton id=”2″]

Canadian Politics: Institutions and Issues – Research Paper

POLS 1010: Canadian Politics: Institutions and Issues – Research Paper – Due
11:59pm Friday, November 22.
Write a paper, not to exceed 6 pages, and no less than 5 pages, typed, double-spaced, on
one of the topics listed below.
1. Canada should either designate a certain, sizeable portion (select 25%, 33%, 50%, or
some greater percentage) of seats in the Senate to be held by indigenous representatives or
Canada should entrench inter-state institutions in the Constitution to create a separate level
of indigenous government within federalism. Examine proposals to guarantee
representation to indigenous peoples in Canada and other states.
2. Healthcare should be a legislative right and responsibility of the federal government
rather than the provincial governments.
3. Canada should adopt institutions at the federal level which employ quotas to guarantee
levels of descriptive representation for women. E.g., reserving 50% of the seats in the
Senate and/or House of Commons.
4. Canada should amend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to explicitly recognize and
protect the right to a healthy environment for all Canadians.
5. Canada should enact a comprehensive ban on the possession of handguns and rapid-fire,
assault firearms. Examine the experience of other states which have banned such firearms
to provide a comparative perspective.
6. Canada should adopt a system of proportional representation or a preferential ballot
instead of the plurality single-member constituency system currently in place.
7. Natural resources should be a legislative right and responsibility of the federal
government rather than the provincial governments.
8. Voting should be mandatory in Canadian elections, both at the federal and provincial
levels. Penalties for non-voting by eligible voters should include fines or possible prison
sentences. Examine other jurisdictions where voting is mandatory to determine if their
provisions are feasible for Canada.
The essay must be 5-6 pages (excluding title page, references, and bibliography, typed and
double-spaced in Times New Roman 12 point font) and 1250-1500 words in length
(excluding title page and references). A title page and APA referencing are all required
components of your paper. The five criteria are described below, with a description of
dimensions of assessment (or rubric) following:
1. Thesis. Have a clear, concise thesis statement in your introductory paragraph. The thesis
should remain the focus of the argument and evidence in the paper.
2. Evidence. Utilize evidence from sources other than Brooks and Menard, Canadian
Democracy. It’s a good starting point to gain some basic information on your topic, and
the authors even give you sources to further pursue at the end of each chapter (obviously,
you want to follow the ones relevant to your chosen topic). News sources are acceptable…
but do not take the place of scientifically researched academic journal articles or books.
3. Presentation. Introduce your topic. State your thesis. Provide an outline of the form your
paper will follow. Support your thesis with evidence and logic. Think of possible objections
to your claims and or arguments and try to respond to them. Conclude your paper by restating
your argument in summary form; but then, analyze or explain the significance or
further implications of your answer to the question. The mechanics of spelling, grammar,
and paragraph structure can either facilitate or impede the clarity of your communication.
Do not forget to employ correct APA formatting.
4. Logic and argumentation. You are making a case for a particular position. Make sure
your arguments are logically connected and reasonable. Consider the counter position.
Failure to account for obvious objections to your position demonstrates a deficiency of
logic and argumentation.
5. Analysis. Employ terms and concepts we have encountered in this class to assess the
validity of positions and arguments. This paper will require you to use critical, independent
thinking to evaluate political ideas. Tell your reader why your answer to the question
Dimensions for assessing Research
Paper Assignment
criteria in a
fashion or not
at all.
(0 – 1 marks)
criteria but
major issues
with quality
or effort.
(2 marks)
Basic and
treatment of
(3 marks)
Very Good
criteria with
(4 marks)
(5 marks)
Thesis – 5 marks – Thesis statement
in opening paragraph is clear,
concise, and argumentative;
informing the reader of what policy
position you are supporting and the
specific basis of support.
Evidence – 5 marks- assessed on the
quality of the evidence and the use
the paper makes of it. At least five
peer-reviewed sources (books or
journal articles) are needed for full
evidence. Omission of seminal
materials widely known and
available constitutes a lapse in
Presentation – 5 marks – Assessed on
spelling, grammar, syntax, paragraph
composition, structure of paper,
clarity of communication. APA
formatting, including references, is
assessed in this dimension.
Logic in Argumentation – 5 marks –
assessed on the logical progression
and support of your argument;
assessed on the presence and
productive use of a counter-argument
(without making a deliberately weak
counter-argument, a.k.a. a “straw
man” argument).
Analysis – 5 marks – assessed on the
correct application of terms and
concepts learned during the course
either from the textbook or from class
lectures to assess the validity of
positions and arguments. Productive
use of at least three such concepts will
demonstrate understanding. Analysis
is assessed on your ability to use
critical, independent thinking to
evaluate political ideas.

The effects of changes in marriage and divorce legislation on individuals and families in Canada

Mid-Term Assignment
1. Explore a variety of research topics related to families in Canada. Select a research topic that you are most interested in and would like to further explore.

MY TOPIC: The effects of changes in marriage and divorce legislation on individuals and families.

2. Formulate ten effective questions to guide your research and inquiry, outlining the importance of your topic and the implications they have on families in Canada.

3. Explain the way norms, values and expectations play a role in your research topic.
– Is your research topic impacted by social forces such as: political agendas, hegemony, religious leaders, etc. that impact norms, values and expectations).

4. Use terms relating to families in Canada such as: family’s systems, life expectancy, replacement rate, primary and secondary data, socialization, social policy, divorce, extended family, etc.
Research terms that are most suitable for your particular topic and explain their significance.

5. Use a combination of photos, videos and audio to present your selected topic.

Have fun working through this assignment and be creative with your choice of presentation

Topic: Internet gambling. Should it be legal?


The first section of your paper will be the arguments for all sides of the issue, put into your own words. Start by giving me an overview of the topic, then I want you to give me a detailed explanation of the arguments for each side of the issue. Use the good sources you found and put what they said into your own words. Be careful: If I can predict what your view is on the topic while I’m reading this section, you will be counted off. This section is for you to explain to me what OTHER PEOPLE say/think about the issue, not what you think about the issue.
The second section is where your personal opinion should be found. In this section, I want you to lay out your views of the topic for me in a logical, consistent, and detailed manner, using the ethical systems we discussed in the first two weeks. Tell me which side of the debate you agree with, and why. You are allowed to choose neither side or some middle ground, as long as you can justify it. Explain to me why you like or dislike each side, but don’t use vague language. Saying “It’s not right” or “It’s the way I was raised” is a cop out. USE WHAT YOU LEARNED IN WEEK ONE AND TWO. Talk about whether there was consequentialism, or Kantian ethics, or Utilitarianism.

Topic: Argument Essay- Wheelen, Hunger, and Hoffman’s (2018) strategic auditing framework


The final assignment for MGT 645 requires the creation of a 8 page argument essay.
Recall that Wheelen, Hunger, and Hoffman’s (2018) strategic auditing framework begins on page 34 of the textbook. Although Wheelen, Hunger, and Hoffman’s offer a popular framework, other frameworks exist and are utilized by companies conducting strategic audits.
For this assignment, you will assert, research, and defend/argue for one of the following positions:
• Wheelen, Hunger, and Hoffman (2018) offer a framework allowing any company to conduct a strategic audit.
• Wheelen, Hunger, and Hoffman (2018) offer a framework allowing only particular kinds of companies to conduct a strategic audit.
• Wheelen, Hunger, and Hoffman’s (2018) framework could be improved by __________ (describe the modification to the framework).
You will need to establish a position and then research (collect information, articles, findings, and relevant materials) to support your position.