Topic: Migration – unaccompanied minors and best interest

Description

‘Where the best interests of the child clearly favour a certain course, that course should be followed unless countervailing reasons of considerable force displace them.’
Per Lord Kerr in ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4, at para 46
Critically discuss the extent to which this statement is an accurate reflection of the law relating to migration in the UK.

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Law
Pages / words-3 / 1650
Number of sources-10
Academic level-Undergraduate
Paper format-OSCOLA
Line spacing-Single
Language style-UK English

same day essays

Topic: Global Drug Trafficking Solution

Description

solution to global drug trafficking. Scholarly Sources must back up the solution..

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Public relations
Pages / words-2 / 550
Number of sources-2
Academic level-Undergraduate
Paper format-APA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

claim your discount

Topic: International Trade and Investment Law

Description

International Trade and Investment

Question

a)

Explain the similarities and differences between the national treatment obligation

relating to non-fiscal regulations in international trade law (WTO) and the national

treatment obligation in international investment law.  (1500 words)

b)

Critically discuss what position on Investor – State dispute settlement system (ISDS) the UK Government should adopt in future free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. (1500 words)

Sources to use (not limited to)

  1. International investment law: text, cases and materials: Krista NadakavukarenSchefer
  • An introduction to global financial markets: Stephen Valdez; Philip Molyneux
  • Law and practice of international finance: Philip Wood
  • Principles of international investment law: Rudolf Dolzer; Christoph Schreuer
  • The origins of international investment law: empire, environment and the safeguarding of capital: Kate Miles
  • The international law on foreign investment: M. Sornarajah
  • Chapter 5: National treatment (pts.1-2) in The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: text, cases and materials: Peter van den Bossche; Werner Zdouc
  • Chapter 8: General and security exceptions (pts.1-2) in The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: text, cases and materials: Peter van den Bossche; Werner Zdouc
  • Governance of global financial markets: the law, the economics, the politics: EmiliosAvgouleas
  1. International economics: Robert C. Feenstra; Alan M. Taylor
  1. Global trade and customs journal. :Kluwer Law International.

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Coursework
Subject-Law
Pages / words-6 / 3000
Number of sources-20
Academic level-Undergraduate
Paper format-OSCOLA
Line spacing-Single
Language style-UK English

claim your discount

Topic: child sexual abuse and those who sexually abuse children.

hAdditional features

Draft required2 pages + well-structured + cited referencesDescription

Analyse the adequacy of the response of the criminal justice system to both victims of child sexual abuse and those who sexually abuse children.


-As many sources as needed and intext citation

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-4 / 1100
Academic level-Sophomore (College 2nd year)
Paper format-MLA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

same day essays

Topic: fact Pattern / Cook Case

Description

Answer the following questions of the fact pattern using, Cook case attached.

In 1922, the United States Congress passes a law, (a domestic statute) the Customs Act, which permits coast guard officials to board and search all vessels which are found up to fifteen miles from the coast. This is during the time of prohibition.
In 1924, the President signs a treaty, which is not ratified by the Senate. One of the terms of the treaty states that the United States government agrees that it will not
search or seize British ships beyond a distance of three miles from the coast.
The British sailing ship, the ‘Stephen Ross’, was located four miles from the coast of the United States. It was seized in April of 1925. It is carrying liquor that has neither been stored nor invoiced properly.

1)Using the principles of the Cook case ( attached), will this be a ‘legal’ seizure?

2)How will an American court resolve this conflict?

3)Also, is there an argument that the lawyers representing the British ship can argue in 1925 concerning customary international law? How will the U.S. court resolve this?

4)Please assume the same facts however in March of 1925 the Senate ratifies the 1924 Treaty with the United Kingdom. The Court deems this treaty to be a non-self-
executing treaty. Will the seizure of the ‘Stephen Ross’ be considered a legal seizure?

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-3 / 825
Academic level-Sophomore (College 2nd year)
Paper format-MLA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

why us bestessayhelp






Topic: Torts law UK

2. ‘The main rules governing causation in tort law demonstrate the justified priority corrective justice has over distributive justice’.
Critically discuss with references to case law, academic literature and theories of justice.

Please include various sources including case law and legal theories in addition to journals

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-1 / 275
Academic level-Sophomore (College 2nd year)
Paper format-MLA
Line spacing-Double
Language style-US English

why us bestessayhelp

Ethics and Legal Issues

Description

Nursing Ethical and Legal Analysis
Select a topic that has legal and ethical issues. Apply your topic in the context of a hypothetical patient scenario. Include in your scenario a nurse or other healthcare professional who will be faced with, or is assisting someone with, an issue and who must determine, based on ethical and legal, the “right” course of action to take. Fully describe your hypothetical scenario and analyze the issue ethically, legally, and then the issue presented in the scenario is decided (nurse or other healthcare professional analyzes the situation/issue presented from both ethical and legal perspective and determines the “right” course of action.
APA 6 with title page, abstract, and references
Written content at least 5 pages, excluding title page, abstract, and references
No 1st person or direct quoting. Use “the nurse” (“the author” if necessary)
Less than 20% score using plagiarism program
7 Required References (minimum):
5 current (published within the last 5 years), scholarly references to use with the ethical and legal issues. Case references are acceptable beyond 5 years if no cases more recent.
The other 2 references are the following textbooks
Additional Descriptive Information Attached



Topic: Wrongful Conception claims involving disabled children/parents.

Appendix 1 – Assessment
You have been asked by the Law Commission to consider whether reform is needed in relation to the ‘Reproductive Torts’. They wish you to advise on the legal and socio-political ramifications of reform as well as the scope of any potential reforms.

The ‘Reproductive Torts’ are claims in negligence which relate to various forms of pre-natal injury. They can be split into three categories of claim. Wrongful Conception cases, brought by parents, typically relate to failings in the provision of sterilisation, vasectomy or contraceptives, or advice relating thereto which results in an unwanted pregnancy. Wrongful Birth cases typically relate to claims brought by parents arising from the failure of a doctor to warn of the risk that a foetus is suffering from a congenital disease. Finally, Wrongful Life cases are brought by a child, who is suffering a congenital disease, against a doctor claiming that but for that doctor’s negligence, the child would not have been born into a life of pain and suffering.

The Commission has requested that your work focus on:

Wrongful Conception claims involving disabled children/parents.

The Committee has requested that the advice be delivered in the form ofa written report(2500-3000 words). Reports should be supported with a range of authoritative sources (including, where relevant, case law, statutes, journal articles, books and monographs, edited collections, Government and Public reports, etc.).

Assessment criteria:
Report
Knowledge and understanding (30%)
Critical evaluation (25%)
Research skills (20%)
Writing skills (15%)
Presentation and referencing skills (10%)

Marking Rubric for Individual Written Report

Criteria 80-100 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 30-39 0-29
Knowledge and understanding
30% Exceptional display of understanding, exploration application and originality of approach to the topic and area of law. Accurately states the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; defines precisely legal terminology relevant to the topic covered. Demonstrates in-depth understanding, exploration
application and an original approach to the topic and area of law. Accurately states the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; defines precisely legal terminology relevant to the topic covered. Demonstrates a good to very good understanding
exploration, application and a comprehensive and appropriate approach to the topic and area of law. No significant inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors in stating the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; correctly uses legal terminology relevant to the topic covered. Demonstrates sound understanding
exploration and application anda standard approach to the topic and area of law. No significant inaccuracies or misunderstandings in stating the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; sound use of legal terminology relevant to the topic covered. Demonstrates adequate understanding
exploration and application of major ideas with little insight and a basic approach to the topic and area of law. Some minor inaccuracies or misunderstandings in stating the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; adequate use of legal terminology relevant to the topic covered. Demonstrates limited understanding
exploration and application of major ideas with very little insight and a poor approach to the topic and area of law. Some significant inaccuracies or misunderstandings in stating the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; unsatisfactory use of legal terminology relevant to the topic covered. Demonstrates very limited, understanding
exploration and application of major ideas with very little insight and a poor approach to the topic and area of law. Some significant inaccuracies or misunderstandings in stating the legal authorities for given legal propositions and scholarly points of view; unsatisfactory use of legal terminology relevant to the topic covered.
Critical evaluation
25%
Inspirational, innovative, authoritative and rigorous approach to analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal of relevant law and literature. Engages in academic debate in an intellectually rigorous way; demonstrates independence of judgment. Evidence of high to very high quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal of relevant law and literature. Engages in academic debate in a professional way, including excellent discussion of potential alternative arguments. Evidence of high quality analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal of relevant law and literature. Engages in academic debate in a professional way, including good to very good discussion of potential alternative arguments. Sound analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal of relevant law and literature. Engages in academic debate in a sound way, including discussion of potential alternative arguments. Largely descriptive; some, but limited, evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisalof relevant law and literature. Some, but limited, engagement in academic debate and discussion of potential alternative arguments. Too descriptive; insufficient evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal of relevant law and literature. Insufficient engagement in academic debate. Too descriptive; analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal of relevant law and literature is inadequate. Inadequate engagement in academic debate.

Criteria 80-100 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 30-39 0-29
Research skills
20%
Outstanding, rigorous, in-depth research. Demonstrates high levels of initiative and ability to effectively identify, locate and extract information from a wide range of relevant primary and secondary sources. Excellent, in-depth research. Demonstrates high levels of initiative and ability to effectively identify, locate and extract information from a wide range of relevant primary and secondary sources. Evidence of good to very good research. Demonstrates good levels of initiative and ability to effectively identify, locate and extract information from a good to very good range of relevant primary and secondary sources. Evidence of sound and appropriate research. Demonstrates ability to identify, locate and extract information from an adequate range of relevant primary and secondary sources. Evidence of adequate but minimal research. Information identified, located and extracted from a very limited range of relevant primary and secondary sources. Minimal research. Information has been identified, located and extracted from a very limited range of relevant primary and secondary sources. Inadequate research. Information has been identified, located and extracted from a very limited range of relevant primary and secondary sources.
Writing skills
15% Report writing style is outstanding, clear, fluent and effectively communicates the work. The organisation and structure of the work is exemplary. Word count is adhered to. Report writing style is excellent, clear, fluent and effectively communicates the work. The organisation and structure of the work is excellent. Word count is adhered to. Report writing style is good to very good, clear, coherent and effectively communicates the work. The work is well organised and well structured. Word count is adhered to. Report writing style is clear and effectively communicates the work. The work is suitably organisedandstructured. May be some minor aberrations from the word count. Report writing style may lack clarity but adequately communicates the work. The work is adequately structured and organised. May be some minor aberrations from the word count. Report writing style does not adequately communicate the work. The work is disorganised and/or poorly structured. May be some significant aberrations from the word count. Report writing style does not adequately communicate the work. The work is disorganised and/or poorly structured. May be some significant aberrations from the word count.
Presentation and referencing skills
10% Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is exemplary throughout. Referencing is accurate, consistent and in accordance with the Studying Law Guide. Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is excellent throughout. Referencing is accurate, consistent and in accordance with the Studying Law Guide. Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is good to very good. Referencing is good to very good and in accordance with the Studying Law Guide. Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is at least sound, with no significant aberrations. Referencing is adequate in accordance with the Studying Law Guide. Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is barely adequate, with some minor aberrations. Referencing is barelyadequate in accordance with the Studying Law Guide. Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is inadequate, with some significant aberrations. Referencing is inadequate in accordance with the Studying Law Guide. Standard of presentation, referencing and acknowledgement of sources is unsatisfactory, with some significant aberrations. Referencing is unsatisfactory in accordance with the Studying Law Guide.


Appendix 3 – Topic Outline
Students will be expected to demonstrate a strong understanding of the key case law in this area, in particular:
McKay v Essex AHA
Mcfarlane v Tayside Health Board
Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust
Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust
Students should also demonstrate an understanding of the Mcfarlaneposition, and the position taken in other commonwealth jurisdictions. There is a vast critical academic literature on the topic and students are expected to utilise this fully.

Students are encouraged to take their own original position in constructing their arguments in relation to the topic and to use evidence fully to support their arguments.

claim your discount

Topic: criminal justice system.

Description

As a journalist, you are constantly writing stories to get people’s attention. Your boss recently asked you to take things to the political sector.
You have been tasked to write an article to address the four amendments that you feel have the most significance on the criminal justice system.
You must include an outline of one landmark case to each of the amendments you choose to write about. Find two with which you agree and explain why the ruling is solid from a legal reasoning perspective. Find two with which you would have ruled opposite of that decision rendered by the Court. Be sure to offer a legal rationale or reasoning (no opinion) for why the Court got it wrong.
Make sure you are clear that these rulings are based on a legal principle and not the facts of the case. Example: Roe v. Wade was not an abortion case, it was about privacy, and the fact that there was a pregnancy is completely secondary. In reality, the pregnant woman, Norma McCorvey, who brought Roe, could not possibly have benefited from the case because she had given birth long before the case arrived in the U.S. Supreme Court.